Home

>

Can local communities in Zimbabwe be trusted with wildlife management?: Evidence from contingent valuation of elephants

19 September 2012
Publication Type: Working Paper
JEL Code: C25, H41, Q26

If local communities living adjacent to the elephant see it as a burden, then they cannot be trusted to be its stewards. To assess their valuation of it, a CVM study was conducted for one CAMPFIRE district in Zimbabwe. Respondents were classified according to their preferences over the elephant. The median WTP for the preservation of 200 elephants is ZW$260 (US$4.73) for respondents who considered the elephant a public good while the same statistic is ZW$137 (US$2.49) for those favouring its translocation. The preservation of 200 elephants yields an annual net worth of ZW$10,828 (US$196) to CAMPFIRE households. However, the majority of households (62%) do not support elephant preservation. This is one argument against devolution of elephant conservation to local communities. Adequate economic incentives must be extended to local communities if their majority is to partake in sound elephant conservation. External transfers constitute one way of providing additional economic incentives.

Series title: Working Paper 052
1 December 2006
Journal: 2008, South African Journal of Economics, 76(4), 685-704
SHARE THIS Working Paper PUBLICATION:
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on telegram
Share on whatsapp
Share on email